LALITA BAIRWA WIFE OF SHRI GAJENDRA SINGH BAIRWA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/2089/2025 · 2025-02-10
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5566 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5566 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2089/2025 Lalita Bairwa Wife Of Shri Gajendra Singh Bairwa, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Gram Post Bhanakpura, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Women And Child Development Department, Janpath, Gandhinagar, Jaipur.
3. Deputy Director, Women And Child Development Department, Karauli, Rajasthan.
4. Child Development Project Officer, Todabhim, Karauli, Rajasthan.
5. Secretary, Gram Panchayat Bhanakpura, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.M. Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 10/02/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that inspite of filing Annx.5 i.e. Legal Notice dated 10.01.2025, the respondents have not adjudicated the grievance of petitioner.
Learned counsel has placed reliance upon judgement of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.
(2 of 2) [CW-2089/2025] 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). Heard. Let notices be issued to respondents. On directions of Court, Mr. S.M. Sharma appearing for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG, accepts notice on behalf of respondent- State.
Learned counsel for the respondents have made no objection and have ensured that the said representation shall be adjudicated within a period of fortnight from the date of filing of the same. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel representing the parties and the consensus drawn inter-se between them, this court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Stay application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J HEENA/128