MAHARSH SEN PRATAP RAO v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/14687/2025 · 2025-10-06
Neeraj Tiwari, Vivek Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55655 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55655 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 14687 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Anup Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that at this stage, he does not want to press the petition, therefore, same may be dismissed as not pressed.
3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. October 7, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anup Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Shukla (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Maharsh Sen Pratap Rao .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad