Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55653 (PAT)

Navin Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./43737/2025 · 2025-09-03

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43551 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2024 Thana- SIWAIPATTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Halchal singh @ Aman kumar @ Halchal kumar Son of Jitendra singh R/o Vill- Harsher P.S- Siwaipatti , Distt.-Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 43737 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2024 Thana- SIWAIPATTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Navin Kumar Singh S/o Uma Shankar Singh R/o Village - Harser, P. S - Siwaipatti , District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 43551 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mazharul Hassan For the State : Mr. Pronoti Singh For the Informant : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 43737 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemant Kumar For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar For the Informant : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 03-09-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Siwaipatti P.S. Case No. 58 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 363, 365, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43551 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 2/2 accused of killing the deceased. On the confessional statement of the petitioner, the dead body was recovered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. He submits that in the trial out of eight witness, six witnesses have been examined. The petitioners are in custody since 18.04.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that the dead body was recovered on the confessional statement of the petitioners and the trial is on the verge of conclusion, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, these applications for regular bail are hereby rejected. anand/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T