$~95 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13505/2025 SANI CHETRY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri, Mr. Sourabh Soni, Mr. Shobhit Anand, & Mr. Ashesh Kumar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Panel Counsel with Ms. Nupur Sharma & Mr. Himanshu Gaur Advocates for UOI alongwith AC Tushar Sharma, SI Atul Sen,CT Sandeep Kumar, CT Rahul Singh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA O R D E R % 28.07.2026 1. On 22.05.2026, this Court in view of order dated 6th April, 2026, passed in SLP 11077-11079/2025, requested Director, AIIMS to have the vision of the petitioner examined by a panel of Ophthalmologists, so as to ascertain the Ophthalmological defect, if any, including the defect of colour vision. 2. The Medical Board was constituted and accordingly examined the petitioner on 20th June, 2026. The report of the Medical Board is handed up in Court taken on record, which reads thus:- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2026 at 15:32:25 3. In the wake of above, it is amply clear that colour vision of the petitioner is within normal limits. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2026 at 15:32:25 4. Once it is certified by the expert Medical Board that the colour vision of the petitioner is within normal limits, the decision of the Medical Board of the respondents, in such an eventuality, stood overruled. 5. As such, in the light of the Apex Court order referred above and the subsequent order dated 15th April, 2026, we deem it appropriate to pass the following order:- a. Having regard to the final impression of the expert Medical Board constituted by the AIIMS, we hold that the petitioner is entitled for the relief as claimed in the petition; b. Consequently, the impugned orders dated 11.02.2025 and 02.07.2025 are hereby set aside; c. The petitioner, namely Mr. Sani Chetry, shall present himself before the competent authority of CISF, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of the order and the respondents, thereafter, shall offer appointment to the petitioner, by enrolling him as a member of CISF, subject to compliance with all other formalities, including successful completion of training; d. In view of the fact that the delay in the matter of joining of the petitioner cannot be attributed to him, it is likely to note his seniority vis-a-vis other members of his batch; e. As such, it is made clear that upon appointment/enrollment of the petitioner, he shall be entitled to notional seniority from the date the others in his batch were appointed/enrolled, as per the rules. However, we make it clear that the petitioner shall not be entitled for any back wages for the said period. 6. The petition stands allowed and disposed of in above terms. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2026 at 15:32:25 7. Pending application (s), if any, also stands disposed of. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AMIT SHARMA, J JULY 28, 2026/nk/db This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2026 at 15:32:25