Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55644 (AP)

Goli Gangadhar Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/25416/2021 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010414602021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25416/2021 Between: 1. GOLI GANGADHAR RAO, S/O PAPA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 21-258A/15, PAPARAJU THOTA, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRCIT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI. 3. THE SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, II TOWN POLICE STATION, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. KASI SAI ESWARA TEJA, S/O SEETHA RAMA PRASAD, HINDU, AGED 28 YEARS BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.4- 132, KOTHAPET, VETAPALEM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to issue write or order or direction more particularly in the nature of mandamus by declaring inaction of the respondent in not registering F.I.R. on the report dated 16-08-2021 given by the petitioner against 5th respondent for the commission of offence without issuing receipt is illegal arbitrary against the Provision of Criminal Procedure Code and violation of Article 21 and 22 of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 4th respondent to register the crime against the 5th respondent and to take appropriate action as per law...” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.11.2025 Asr 386 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25416 of 2021 Dt.22.11.2025 Asr