Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55641 (MAD)

G.Sargunavathi v. Railway Protection Force,

WMP/19229/2021 · 2025-04-21

K Rajasekar, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WMP No. 19229 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR WMP No. 19229 of 2021 IN WP NO. 18006 OF 2021 G.Sargunavathi Old No.35, New No.58/1, 25th Street Extension, Sathyavanimuthu Street, GKM Colony, Chennai 600 082. Petitioner(s) Vs Railway Protection Force, Rep. by its Sr. Divisional Scrutiny Commissioner, Office of the Sr.Divisional Scrutiny Commissioner, Southern Railway, Moore Market complex, Chennai 600 003. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.G.R.Prasad for M/S Row And Reddy For Respondent: Mr.P.T.Ramkumar Standing Counsel for Railways https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP No. 19229 of 2021 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) It is brought to the notice of this Court that State Level Scrutiny Committee is yet to conduct an enquiry to ascertain the genuinity of the community of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the Committee has to conduct an enquiry and submit a report regarding the genuinity of the community certificate. Stalling the enquiry would cause prejudice to both the parties. 3. Ultimately, the community of the person is to be ascertained by conducting an adjudication based on the documents and evidences by the State Level Scrutiny Committee, which is the competent authority. High Court cannot conduct enquiry into the disputed facts relating to community. Thus, the petitioner is at liberty to participate in the process of enquiry to be conducted by the State Level Scrutiny Committee by producing all the documents and evidences in this case. 4. The State Level Scrutiny Committee shall proceed with the enquiry and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP No. 19229 of 2021 5. With this direction, the Interim stay already granted by this Court stands vacated. Post the matter after four weeks. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(K.RAJASEKAR J.) 21-04-2025 gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP No. 19229 of 2021 To 1.Railway Protection Force, Rep. by its Sr. Divisional Scrutiny Commissioner, Office of the Sr.Divisional Scrutiny Commissioner, southern Railway, Moore Market complex, chennai 600 003. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WMP No. 19229 of 2021 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND K.RAJASEKAR J. gd WMP No. 19229 of 2021 IN WP NO. 18006 OF 2021 21-04-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis