Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55641 (KAR)

SRI B M KAMBLE v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1036/2022 · 2025-09-26

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39154 WP No. 1036 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1036 OF 2022 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI B M KAMBLE S/O MACHEENDRA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT A/P.NOVARAGI, TQ. CHADCHAN DIST. VIJAYAPUR 586205. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. GEETA R SHINDHE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA,BENGALURU 560001. 2. THE SECRETARY PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001. 3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CUM APPOINTING AUTHORITY KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTING SOCIETY NO.179, 1/2/3 FLOORS, ROOPA COMPLEX, 1ST MAIN SUBEDAR CHATRAM ROAD SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU-560002. 4. THE PRINCIPAL MORARJI DESAI SCHOOL MARGOOR, TALUK INDI DISTRICT BIJAPUR 586209. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39154 WP No. 1036 of 2022 (BY SRI.VIKAS R, AGA FOR R1 & R2: SRI. SIDHARTH BABU RAO, AGA FOR R3: R4 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT THE BENEFIT OF SERVICE WEIGHTAGE TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2010-2011 VIDE ANNEXURE-M AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED:21.10.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-M AND ABSORB HIM ON PAR WITH TEACHERS WHO WERE ABSORBED IN TERMS OF NOTIFICATION DATED:27.4.2011 WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS VIDE ANNEXURE-S AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 19.12.2024 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 29