DR. MOHD SHOEB NADVI v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/6651/2025 · 2025-05-14
Vikram D Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55641 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55641 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:79755 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6651 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Mohd Shoeb Nadvi Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Wajid Ali Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Abrar Ahmad,Shashank Shekhar Singh Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Abrar Ahmad,
learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Sri Shashank Shekhar Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 4.
2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No.4 to pay all the retiral and terminal benefits such as gratuity, earned leave etc. to the petitioner. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No.4 to consider the case of the petitioner in respect of not granting increment, downscaling his pay scale, pay band and further not granting other benefits after the contract dt. 18.7.2022. (iii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent concerned to pass appropriate orders upon the representation of the petitioner dt.27.3.2025 (Annexure No.13 to the writ petition) within some reasonable time, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the claim of petitioner with regard to payment of retiral dues and terminal benefits after being retired from the post of Teacher in the respondent institution is pending before respondent. In this respect, petitioner has filed representation dated 27.3.2025, however till date, no order has been passed.
4. Learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 4 submits that claim of petitioner would be decided in a time bound manner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is hereby provided that respondent no.4-Finance Officer (salary)/(budget)/ (grant)/(leave)/PF, working in the office of Finance & Account of
Aligarh Muslim University, District Aligarh shall decide the representation dated 27.3.2025 filed by petitioner in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order.
6. It is clarified that this Court has not decided the issue on merits and the authorities concerned shall independently apply its mind and pass order in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 15.5.2025 D. Tamang Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad