Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55640 (BOM)

SURAJ PRABHAKAR TURANKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PSO PS GHUGGUS DIT CHANDARPUR

APPA/1048/2024 · 2025-02-13

Urmila Joshi Phalke

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21.appa.1048.24.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1048 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.607 OF 2024 (Suraj s/o Prabhakar Turankar Vs. State of Maharashtra) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. C.A. Lokhande, APP for the State. CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- FEBRUARY 13, 2025. Heard. 2. By this application, the appellant is seeking suspension of sentence. 3. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and gone through the evidence as well as the impugned judgment. At this stage, I have shown my disinclination to suspend the sentence. 4. Learned Counsel for the appellant has not pressed the application. 5. The application is disposed of as not pressed. 6. The appellant is at liberty to file another application if the appeal is not dispose of at the earliest. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.607 OF 2024 7. Considering the record and proceedings is already received, appeal can be decided finally. 21.appa.1048.24.odt 2 8. Registry to expedite the preparation of the paper book considering the appellant is behind bar. 9. The appeal be listed for the final disposal as per its turn. (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) *Divya