RAM BHAJAN CHAUHAN AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/35070/2022 · 2025-05-05
Prakash Padia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55632 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55632 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:75137 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35070 of 2022 Petitioner :- Ram Bhajan Chauhan And 8 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atmaram Nadiwal,Dinesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Satyam Singh Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Vibhu Rai for respondent no.4.
2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition inter alia with the following prayer:-
"(i)issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 to decide the claim of the petitioners in pursuance of letter dated 16.03.2016 passed by respondent no. 2, expeditiously preferably within a stipulated period, in the interest of justice."
3. It is argued that though various awards were made by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gorkahpur from time to time in favour of the petitioners but till date the same has yet not been complied with.
4. On the other hand, it is argued by Sri Vibhu Rai, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 that a complete procedure has been prescribed under Industrial Law to execute the award and in case of filing the present writ petition, petitioners should approached the Tribunal itself.
5. At this point of time a prayer has been made by the counsels of the petitioners to dismiss the present writ petition with a liberty to approach the Trial Court.
6. Accordingly, petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 PS Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad