Smt. Munnangi Mahalaksmi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/24859/2025 · 2025-09-21
R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55628 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55628 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010487632025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 24859/2025 Between:
1. SMT. MUNNANGI MAHALAKSMI,, W/O. LATE SADASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. HOUSE NO 6-6, VIPPARLA REDDYPALEM, ROMPICHARLA MANDAL,
PALNADU DISTRICT,PRESENTLY R/O. FLAT NO.505, YAGANTI NICE APTS, 3/6, VIDYA NAGAR, GUNTUR- 522 007. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DIG OF POLICE, GUNTUR RANGE, AT ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA POLICE COMMISSIONERATE VIJAYAWADA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR. 5. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CENTRAL ZONE, VIJAYAWADA. 6. THE SHO, PATAMATA PS, VIJAYAWADA. 7. THE SHO, PATTABHIPURAM PS, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction to produce the Petitioners son, victim/detainee namely, Munnangi Venkatesh S/o. Late Sadasiva Rao aged 34 years, resident of Flat No.505, Yaganti Nice Apartments, 3/6, Vidya Nagar, Guntur before this Honble Court and set him at liberty by declaring (i) the action of the Respondents in confining him without arrest as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and shackle to personal liberty and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India (ii) declare the detention of the Petitioners son as also contrary to the discharge of their official duty and the same may be recorded in their ACRs (iii) to pay compensation to the Petitioners son for his illegal detention in the hands of the Respondents and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to verify the CC Camera recordings in the neighborhood on 10.09.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T BALASWAMI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
T BALASWAMI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL
The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the passport of the petitioner has been returned and nothing further survives in the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J
Date: 22.09.2025 MJA
564
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 24859 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
22.09.2025
MJA