Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55620 (KAR)

SRI. B PUNDARIKAKSHA RAO v. SRI. B CHANDRASHEKAR RAO

CRP/9/2018 · 2025-10-14

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40608 CRP No. 9 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 9 OF 2018 (RES) BETWEEN: SRI. B PUNDARIKAKSHA RAO S/O LATE B. RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO 2-64 -A DURGA NIVAS, MEGINA PETE NEAR POLICE STATION, MULKI, MANGALORE TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 154. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. LAKSHMI DEVI K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. B CHANDRASHEKAR RAO S/O LATE B. RAMAKRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.2-64 AND 64-A, DURGA NIVAS, MEGINA PETE, NEAR POLICE STATION, MULKI MANGLAORE TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 154. 2. SRI. B. RATHNAKAR RAO S/O LATE B. RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40608 CRP No. 9 of 2018 3. SRI. B. MADHUSUDHAN RAO S/O LATE B. RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 4. SRI. B. DINESH RAO S/O LATE B. RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 5. SRI. B. PURUSHOTHAMA RAO S/O LATE B. RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 6. SRI. B. HARISH RAO S/O LATE B. RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 7 ARE ALL R/AT NO.2-64A, DURGA NIVAS, MEGINA PETE, NEAR POLICE STATION, MULKI, MANGALORE TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT -574 154. 7. SRI. B. VISHNUMRTHY RAO S/O LATE B.RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT SRI RAMAKRISHNA NILAYA S.V. TEMPLE ROAD, MANAPADY, MULKI, MANGALORE TALUK, D.K. DIST 574 154. 8. SMT. UMA GOPALA BHAT W/O GOPALA BHAT D/O LATE B. RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT SHARADA COFFEE HOUSE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40608 CRP No. 9 of 2018 BASAVANI POST, THEERTHAHALLI TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 432. 9. SMT. KAVERI VASUDEVA RAO W/O P. VASUDEVA RAO D/O LATE B. RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT SRI GANESH NILAYA KANYADI-II, DHARMASTHALA POST BELTHANGADI TALUK D.K. DISTRICT - 574 216. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K CHANDRANATH ARIGA AND SRI. M.K. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. B. RATHNAKAR RAO, R2 SERVED SRI. B. MADHUSUDHAN RAO, R3 SERVED SRI. B. DINESH RAO., R4 SERVED SMT. UMA GOPALA BHAT., R8 SERVED V/O DATED 14/02/2018 NOTICE TO R5 TO R7 IS DISPENSED WITH AND NOTICE IN R/O OF R9 KAVERI VASUDEVA RAO- HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.11.2017 PASSED IN OS.NO.298/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MANGALURU, D.K., ITINERARY COURT, MOODABIDRI, NEGATIVELY ANSWERING ADDITIONAL ISSUE NO.1 AND 2 IS BY HOLDING THAT THE SUIT IS PROPERLY VALUED, REQUISITE COURT FEE IS PAID ON THE PLAINT AND THIS COURT HAVE PECUNIARY JURISDICTION TO TRY THIS SUIT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40608 CRP No. 9 of 2018 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as under: "The petitioner respectfully submits that the suit in O.S.No.298/2015 (Re-numbered as O.S.No.81/2003 on the file of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Moodabidri) is disposed simple imprisonment for by judgment and decree dated 17.01.2024, the present revision petition becomes infructuous, which may kindly be taken on record.'' Memo is taken on record. In view of the disposal of the suit before the Trial Court on merits, present revision petition has rendered infructuous and accordingly it is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14