ARVIND @ AVINASH SHRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CRMP/3312/2025 · 2025-11-24
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55617 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55617 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:57185-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3312 of 2025 Arvind @ Avinash Shrivastava S/o Shri Hirendra Aged About 31 Years R/o House No. 10, 5th Batalion Colony, Jagdalpur District Bastar C.G.
--- Petitioner(s) versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Frezarpur, District Bastar, C.G.
2. Smt. Divya Shrivastava W/o Shri Arvind @ Avinash Shrivastava Aged About 27 Years Occupation Service R/o Dokarighat Para, Vijay Ward No. 02, Jagdalpur, District Bastar C.G.
--- Respondent(s) CRMP No. 3353 of 2025 Hirendra Pal Shrivastava S/o Late Shri Harinarayan Shrivastava Aged About 60 Years R/o 5th Battalion Kangoli, Qtr. No. N/10, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Station House Officer, Police Station- Frejarpur, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.11.26 12:08:49 +0530
2
2. Smt. Divya Shrivastava W/o Shri Arvind @ Avinash Shrivastava Aged About 27 Years Occupation- Service R/o. Dokarighat Para, Vijay Ward No. 02, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioners : Mr. Manish Nigam, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Dy. A.G. For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Vaibhav P. Shukla, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
25/11/2025
1. By the present petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:-
“CRMP No. 3312 of 2025 : (filed by petitioner, who is husband of respondent No.2) (i) Quash the FIR No.34/2022 (Annexure-P/1), registered at P.S.-Frezarpur, District-Bastar for offence under section 498-A of the IPC. (ii) Quash the Final Report No. 37/2022 dated 15/03/2022 (Annexure-P/2) filed against the petitioner for the offence punishable under section 498(A) of IPC. (iii) Quash the orders dated 20/09/2022 and Memo of Charge (Annexure-P-5) passed by the Court of Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jagdalpur District Bastar
3 (CG) whereby charges punishable under section 498-A of IPC has been framed against the Petitioner and the Application compounding of offence was rejected. iv) Quash the entire Criminal Proceedings in Criminal Case no. 584/2022 (State of CG v. Arvind alias Avinash), pending before JMFC, Bastar, Place-Jagdalpur. (v) Grant any other relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.
“CRMP No. 3353 of 2025 (filed by petitioner, who is father-in-law of respondent No.2) (i) Quash the FIR No.30/2021 (Annexure-P/1), registered at P.S.-Frezarpur, District-Bastar for offence under section 354 and 509-A of the IPC. (ii) Quash the Final Report dated 22/03/2021 (Annexure- P/2) filed against the petitioner for the offence punishable under section 354, 509-A, 354-A of IPC. (iii) Quash the order dated 3/9/2021and Memo of Charge (Annexure-P-3) passed by the Court of Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jagdalpur District Bastar (CG) whereby charges punishable under section 354, 509-A, 354-A of IPChas been framed against the Petitioner. 4 (iv) Set aside, the order dated 20/9/2022 (Annexure P-5) whereby application under section 320 (2) & 320 (8) of the Cr.P.Cfor compounding of offence was rejected. (v) Quash the entire Criminal Proceedings in Criminal Case no. 633/2021 (State of CG v. Hirendra Pal), pending before JMFC, Bastar, Place-Jagdalpur. (vi) Grant any other relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the mediation dated 17.11.2025 between the parties is successful and the mediation report is on record. 3. For the sake of convenience, it would be appropriate to reproduce the contents of mediation report dated 17.11.2025 which reads as under:-
समझौता प्ቔ
"
माननय उ्ሴ न्ययलय के आदेश दिदेनके 04.11.2025
के परिपलन मा यह
्ቚकेण ्ቅमाके CRMP No. 3312/2025 (Arvind @ Avinash Shrivastava Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.)
एवं आदेश दिदेनके 07.11.2025
के परिपलन मा यह ्ቚकेण ्ቅमाके CRMP No. 3353/2025 (Hirendar Pal Shrivastava Vs.
State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.) मा
माध्य्ቝता हता ्ቚषि ता षिकेय गय दिदेनके 17.11.2025
के" माध्य्ቝता ्ቚषिकेय संप्ቐ षिकेय।
माध्य्ቝता ्ቚषिकेय के अनरूप प्ቌकेगण के माध्य एकेल एवं संयक्ता सं्ቔ माध्य्ቝता
के न््ቖ छቈኍसंगढ़ उ्ሴ न्ययलय,
षि/लसंप मा दिदेनके 17.11.2025
के" उभयप्ቌ
के माध्य आय"जि2ता षिकेय गय।
आ2 दिदेनके के" उभयप्ቌ अषितामा षिनण3य के4 ቝኌ्ቝषिता मा पुሺ7च चके ह9 औ उनके माध्य
षिवंवंदे स्वंስኋप=वं3के प=ण3 संहमाषिता के संथ संभ षिवंवंदे" प षिनपटा के अपन आग
5
के 2वंन अलग-
अलग हके षिनवं3ह के अपन षिवंवंदे के" त्यग के 2वंन
षिनवं3हन केन हता संहमाता ह9 एवं भषिवंष्य मा दे"नB प्ቌ षिकेसं भ ्ቚके के षिवंवंदे नहC
केग। ताथ एके दुसं के" शरिके एवं मानसिसंके रूप सं ्ቚताषिFता नहC केग।
दे"नB प्ቌB के षिवंवंह 30.01.2013
के" सं्ቘ्ቐ ुሺआ। उक्ता षिवंवंह के पቐኋताI ्ቚथमा
प्ቔ दिदेኋ᭦श ቦኍवंस्तावं के 2न्मा ुሺआ 2" वंता3मान मा 11
वं 3 के वं के्ቌ 5
वंC मा
अध्ययनताI ह9।
इसंके अषितारिक्ता उभयप्ቌ एके-
दूसं के ्ቚषिता दुभ3वंन प=वं3के केय3 नहC केग ताथ
ननय 2०एमा०एफ०सं, 2गदेलप, जि2ल-
/स्ता मा लषि/ता अपध ्ቅमाके- 30/2021
अपध अताग3ता ध 354 509A
भ०दे०षिवं० पसिलसं स्टाशन फ 2प जि2ल-
/स्ता मा लषि/ता ह9.
षिकेसं परिवंदेन आग नहC चलन चहता।
उभयप्ቌ एके-
दूसं सं षिकेसं भ /ता के" लके वंदे-
षिवंवंदे नहC केग ताथ ऐसं
ቝኌ्ቝषिता मा अपसं /ता-
चता सं षिवंवंदे के षिनपटा केग औ पषिता-
पቌኌत्न सं उत्प्ቐ
संतान माषिनता दिदेኋ᭦श ቦኍवंस्तावं के" स्वंता्ቔता ह"ग के4 वंह स्वंता्ቔता प=वं3के अपन माता-
षिपता सं उनके घ 2के मालकेता केता हग औ माता-
षिपता मा सं जि2संके
पसं हन चह वंह इቈኍसं /ता प स्वंता्ቔ हग ताथ माता-
षिपता भ अपन /्ሴ
दिदेኋ᭦श के उቈኍ"ቈኍ ्ቚगषिता एवं अስኋT पढ़ई के सिलय ्ቚषिता/्ቍ हग।
/्ሴ दिदेኋ᭦श ቦኍवंस्तावं के देदे अपन प"ता दिदेኋ᭦श ቦኍवंस्तावं के नमा सं 05
वं W के
सिलय 50,000/- (
पचसं ह2 रूपय)
के FD
केग औ उक्ता FD
के4 एके ्ቚषिता
/्ሴ के4 माB के पसं सं्ቌथ3 2मा केग।
माननय उ्ሴ न्ययलय के आदेशनसं अनवंदिदेके के" आ2 दिदेनके 17.11.2025
के" 50,000/- (
पचसं ह2 रूपय)
एवं 25,000/- (
प्ሴसं ह2 रूपय)
के4 सिश माध्य्ቝता के न््ቖ के माध्यमा सं ्ቚप्ता ह" चके4 ह9।
उभयप्ቌ इसं संमाझौZता प्ቔ के4 शताW सं संहमाता ह[ एवं पलन के सिलए केदिटा/्ቍ ह[
संमाझौZता प्ቔ मा देT गई शताW के" उन्हBन अपन स्वंय के4 स्वंስኋप=वं3के संहमाषिता एवं
षि/न षिकेसं दे/वं,
भय एवं ललच के स्वंके षिकेय गय ह9 उभयप्ቌ न इसं
संमाझौZता प्ቔ के4 शताW के" पढ़न वं संमाझौन के पቐኋता अपन स्वंता्ቔ संहमाषिता सं
प्ቢ एके-
दूसं के4 उपቝኌ्ቝषिता मा हस्ता्ቌ के षिनष्पदिदेता षिकेय।"
4. In view of the above submission made by the counsel and looking to the mediation report itself that mediation is successful between the parties, both the CRMPs are allowed, subject to fulfillment of terms and conditions of the mediation report dated 17.11.2025
5.
Accordingly,
6 • in CRMP No. 3312 of 2025 FIR bearing Crime Number 34/2022 registered at P.S. Frezarpur, District Bastar C.G. for offence under Sections 498 A of IPC; final report No.37/2022 dated 15/03/2022; and order dated 20.09.2022 passed in Criminal Case No. 584/2022 including consequential proceedings pending before the learned JMFC District- Baster, against the petitioner (who is the husband of respondent No.2) are hereby quashed; and • in CRMP No. 3353 of 2025 FIR bearing Crime Number 30/2021 registered at P.S. Frejarpur, District Bastar C.G. for offence under Sections 354, 509-A of IPC; final report dated 22/03/2021; and order dated 20.09.2022 passed in Criminal Case No. 633 of 2021 including consequential proceedings pending before the learned JMFC District-Baster, against the petitioner (who is the father-in-law of respondent No.2) are hereby quashed. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti