1 2025:CGHC:53554-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2309 of 2023 1 - Mohan Lal Patel S/o Late Shri Govardhan Patel Aged About 34 Years R/o Village And Post - Pirda, P.S. - Basna, Tehsil - Pithora, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 2 - Hariram Choudhary S/o Shri Bhagirathi Choudhary Aged About 69 Years R/o Village And Post Pirda, P.S. Basna, Tehsil Pithora, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Station Basna, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Sangh Maryadit Through Managing Director, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Marketing OfÏcer District Marketing Federation, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector (Food Branch) District Mahasamund (C.G.) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.11.04 10:37:10 +0530 2 5 - Deputy Registrar Cooperative Society, Mahasamund, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 6 - Shivnath Patel Posted as Branch Manager, Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur, Branch Pitda, Tehsil Pithora, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioners : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Ms. Saumya Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 03.11.2025 1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer :- “It is, therefore, prayed that the petition may kindly be allowed and the Charge-sheet No. 563/2021 (Annexure P-1), for the offences punishable under sections 406, 409, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, (only in respect to the petitioners), may kindly be quashed, in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the charges have been framed against the present petitioners, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition to which learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this 3 Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take appropriate recourse to law. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioners after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice S. Bhilwar/ Rahul