Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55601 (CHH)

Smt.mayadevi Gupta And Anr. v. Sukhnath And Ors.

FA/184/2013 · 2025-11-23

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:57033 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 184 of 2013 1 - Smt.Mayadevi Gupta W/o Krishna Kumar Gupta Aged About 57 Years R/o Khaparganj, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., Chhattisgarh 2 - Krishna Kumar Gupta S/o Nandlal Gupta Aged About 62 Years R/o Khaparganj, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Sukhnath S/o Kamta Prasad Aged About 60 Years R/o Near Chilhati Turning, Village- Mopka, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., Chhattisgarh 2 - Ram Kumar S/o Kapil Aged About 50 Years R/o Near Chilhati Turning Village- Mopka, P.S. Mopka, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of C.G. Thru- Collector, Bilaspur C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) Order Sheet 24/11/2025 None for the appellant. Shri Aman Ansari, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Keshav Dewangan, Advocate for respondent No.2. Shri Aman Tamboli, Panel Lawyer for the State. Even in second round, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of appellant to press the appeal. Thus, this court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder