Gurijala Venkata Ramanaiah, v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/27161/2021 · 2025-11-23
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55597 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55597 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010448472021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27161/2021 Between:
1. GURIJALA VENKATA RAMANAIAH,, S/O.VENKATADRI NAIDU, AGED 75 YEARS, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VINJAMUR VILLAGE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 27-1-993, LAKSHMI NAGAR, BALAJI NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, AT NELLORE. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VINJAMUR POLICE STATION, VINJAMUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. GANAPAM BRAHMA REDDY, S/O.SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O.NADIMURU, VINJAMUR PANCHAYAT, VINJAMUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2
7. YATHAPU LAKSHMI KUMARI, W/O.NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O.NADIMURU, VINJAMUR PANCHAYAT, VINJAMUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 8. CHENNAREDDY SARASWATI, W/O.RARNACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O.144/7A/3, BHARATHINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 9. YATHAPU NARAYANA REDDY, S/O.BHALLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O.NADIMURU, VINJAMUR PANCHAYAT, VINJAMUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 10. YATHAPU SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O.BHALL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.NADIMURU, VINJAMUR PANCHAYAT, VINJAMUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 11. BAYYAPUREDDY RAMASUBBA REDDY, S/O.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/ O.YARRABALIPALEM, VINJAMUR PANCHAYAT, VINJAMUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 12. YATHAPU RAJESH REDDY, S/O.CHENNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O.NADIMURU, VINJAMUR PANCHAYAT, VINJAMUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 13. PALLALA PRASAD REDDY, S/O.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.NADIMURU, VINJAMUR PANCHAYAT, VINJAMUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 14.
CHENNAREDDY RAMCHANDRA REDDY, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.144/7A/3, BHARATHINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Authorities more particularly the Respondent No.5 in not registering Case/FIR against the Respondents 6 to 14 basing on the Complaint of the Petitioner dated 22-10- 2021, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, against to principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the Respondent Authorities to register FIR against the Respondents 6 to 14 and proceed with the case, and to pass
3
IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.5 to register Case/FIR against the Respondents 6 to 14, basing on the Complaint of the Petitioner dated 22-10-2021, and proceed with the case, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. P S P SURESH KUMAR
4
The Court made the following order:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Authorities more particularly the Respondent No.5 in not registering Case/FIR against the Respondents 6 to 14 basing on the Complaint of the Petitioner dated 22.10.2021 as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, against to principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent Authorities to register FIR against the Respondents 6 to 14 and proceed with the case and pass...…”
2.
Heard Sri B.V.Rama Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.11.2025 SNI
5
38 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 27161/2021
Dt.24.11.2025
SNI