Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55596 (AP)

Kalluri Vasudeva Reddy v. The Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams

WP/1078/2013 · 2025-11-21

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010471062013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 1078/2013 Between: 1. KALLURI VASUDEVA REDDY, S/O SIDDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC FIELD ASSISTANT TTD GARDEN OFFICE, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2. MIDDI BAVAJI, S/O BUDEN SAHEB AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT TTD GARDEN OFFICE, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, KT ROAD, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2. THE DY EXECUTIVE OFFICER SERVICES, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, KT ROAD, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ or Order or Direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the cases of the petitioners for promotion to the cadre of Junior Lecturer/Lecturer under recruitment by transfer for the vacant teaching posts in TTD educational Institutes as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to consider the cases of petitioners for appointment to the posts of Junior Lecturer/Lecturer under recruitment by transfer in the TTD Educational Institutions IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 1307 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspesnd the operation of the Circular Roc.No.EDN-2/11203/2012 dated 31.12.2012 of the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of Writ Petition IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 1308 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to hold any walk-in-certificate verification of the employees / Departmental Promotion Committee Scheduled to be held on 16.01.2013 and 17.01.2013 or on any subsequent date and for considering promotions to the posts of Junior Lecturers / Lecturers from non teaching cadre under recruitment by transfer, pending disposal of Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B NARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ' 2. A SUMANTH ( SC FOR TTD) The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 14.11.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Page 3 of 4 Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.11.2025 TVN 56 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.1078 OF 2013 Date: 22.11.2025 TVN