-1- 2025:CGHC:30392 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4194 of 2021 Yogita Sahu, W/o Tikaram Sahu, Aged About 33 Years R/o. Village Dhiri, Police Station Somani, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Tikaram Sahu, S/o Late Mangalram Sahu, Aged About 40 Years R/o. Village Bendri, Police Station Rakhi, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Union of India, Through Income Tax Department, Office Of The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For Respondent No.1 : None For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Shubham Bajpai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 03.07.2025 1) The petitioner, who is the wife of respondent No.1, has filed the present petition against respondent No.1, claiming a right over the property on the ground that -2- an agreement was entered into between the petitioner and respondent No.1, whereby respondent No.1 agreed to pay a lump sum amount of Rs. 30 lakhs and transfer a piece of land towards the maintenance of the petitioner and her children. 2) It appears that an agreement was executed between the petitioner and respondent No.1 on 08.03.2019 (Annexure P/3), wherein respondent No.1 agreed to provide 1/3rd share of his exclusive property. 3) Learned counsel Mr. Mishra and Mr. Bajpai submitted that the present matter is a private dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.1, and therefore, the petition is not maintainable. 4) Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is claiming right over the property of respondent No.1 on the basis of an agreement dated 08.03.2019, this Court is of the opinion that the present petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed at the motion stage itself. 5) However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail an appropriate remedy available under the law. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim