Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55587 (CHH)

JANAK RAM SURYAWANSHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5913/2025 · 2025-11-18

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:56252 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5913 of 2025 1 - Janak Ram Suryawanshi S/o Santram Suryawanshi Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Birkona, Post Birkona, District Bilaspur C.G. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Sc/st Commission, Bhagat Singh Chowk, Shankar Nagar, Near Pahuna, District- Raipur C.G. 2 - Collector, Bilaspur C.G. 3 - Inspector General Of Police, Bilaspur C.G. 4 - Superintendent Of Police, Bilaspur C.G. 5 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bilaspur C.G. 6 - Thana Incharge, Police Station Koni, Bilaspur C.G. 7 - Suryawanshi Samaj, Through Maniram S/o Saheb Lal, R/o Kapurtal Birkona, Tahsil And District Bilaspur C.G. 8 - Suryawanshi Samaj, Through Secretary Baisakhu Ram S/o Sukhan, R/o Manjhwapara, Birkona, Tahsil And District Bilaspur C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 6/State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer 2 SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 19 /11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 5 (Sub-Divisional Officer, Revenue) and Respondent No. 4 (Superintendent of Police) to take immediate action on petitioner’s representation and ensure that no social boycott is imposed upon the petitioner. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a direction to the Respondents No. 07 & 08 (Society) to permit the petitioner’s participation in all community functions and activities. 10.3 That, This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct disciplinary/penal action against the responsible office-bearers of the society under the prevailing law. 10.4 Pass any other order or direction deemed fit in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is facing social boycott and therefore, he has made representations to different authorities, however, no action has been taken on his representation. He submits that direction be issued to the Respondent No. 5/Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) to conclude the proceedings at the earliest within specified time. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/State opposes the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and would submit that he has instructions in the matter and according to her instructions, on the application submitted by the petitioner before the Collector, District – Bilaspur, the Collector, Bilaspur has called for a report from Tehsildar, Tehsil – Bilaspur and the case is registered in the Court of Additional Tehsildar, Tehsil – Bilaspur on 30.10.2025. She also contended that lastly, the case was fixed on 12.11.2025, however, none of the parties appeared 3 before the Tehsildar, Tehsil – Bilaspur. She further submits that in view of the above, the writ petition is premature. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the proceedings have already been started, as per the submission of learned counsel for the Respondent/State, therefore, direction may be issued to the concerned authorities to conclude the proceedings within specified time. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the documents placed on record. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of counsel for the respective parties and particularly, the fact that the application which is submitted by the petitioner before the Respondent No. 2/Collector, has been taken cognizance and report is called from the Additional Tehsildar, Tehsil – Bilaspur, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Additional Tehsildar, Tehsil – Bilaspur to conclude the proceedings at the earliest, prefereably within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order subject to cooperation of the petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid observation and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY