Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55586 (AP)

DONDAPATI VENKATESHWARLU, v. THE REGIONAL MANAGER & ANOTHER

WP/10985/2005 · 2025-04-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ctr, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) /”■ THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE V\- PRESENT TMi HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10985 OF 2005 / Between: Dondapati Venkateshwarlu, S/o. Late Venkatappa Discharged employee of The Respondents R/o. Kpllala Village, Mandal Ongole, Dist. Prakasam and Presently Residing at H.No. 1-2-2 (16), Shanti Hill Colony, Seetarampuram,^" Ongole, Dist: Prakasham. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Benz Circle, Bandar Road, Vijayawada. 2. The Dy. General Manager, Zonal Office, Central Bank of India, Bank ,/ Street,. Hyderabad. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to pass an order writ particularly writ in the nature of Certiorary Calling for the records pertaining the order of the respondent No.2 in Proceedings No. ZO: PRS; 2004-05; 35, dt. 31®* March, 2005, in which the may I n-. i. order of the respondent No.1 in proceedings No. VROiPRS: 2004-2005 1728, dt. 20th Jan. 2005 refirsing to pay the pensionary and other benefits to the petitioner and declare the same as illegal and malafide and pass any other suitable orders for which the petitioner is legally entitle and the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 14085 OF 20051 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order directing the respondent No.1 pensionary benefits of the petitioner on his service i.e, date of his permanent appointment in the month of Sept., 1972 till the final discharge on 17-5-1996 by the respondent along with other benefits forthwith without further delay and continue to pay the same pending the disposal of the writ Petition, in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A V S RAMA KRISHNA < Counsel for the Respondents: SRI CH SIVA REDDY The Court made the following: to fix the rs APHC010262442005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] ■I THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10985/2005 Between: Dondapati Venkateshwarlu, ...PETITIONER AND The Regional Manager Another and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) LAVS RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.CH SIVA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: On 08.04.2025 and 17.04.2025, there is no representation for the petitioner and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 2. 3. fxV> As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ^5*^' RAO ACHARI assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to SRI. A V S RAMA KRISHNA, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI. CH SIVA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies sree HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.10985 of 2005 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS