221 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25302-2025 Date of Decision:30.07.2025 Sabir …Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Anr. …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. D.S Matya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr.DAG, Haryana. ***** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail in FIR No.43, dated 06.02.2025 registered under Sections 420,120-B of IPC, at Police Station City Sohna, District Gurugram. 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 13.05.2025, the following contentions were noticed by this Court and the same have been reproduced below:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that essentially there is a civil dispute between the parties and the petitioner has already filed a civil suit before the Court of Civil Judge (SD), Sohna. He next submits that in the present case, the FIR has been got registered by the complainant as a counter blast to the civil suit filed by the petitioner. Moreover, it is a case of documentary evidence and the custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required. Learned counsel HITESH 2025.07.30 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-25302-2025 -2 further submits that the petitioner is ready to amicably settle the dispute with the complainant and is also ready to return the loan amount to the complainant in the present case ”. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the submissions and further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation may not be required. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Sahun Khan also submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 13.05.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 30.07.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.07.30 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh