Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55583 (AP)

Sri Vyasaraja Mutt (Sosale), v. K Jairaj

WP/1251/2015 · 2025-01-01

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) y ^ THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY ((^d TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1251 OF 2015 -#1 3 OV3 > Between: Sri Vyasaraja Mutt (Sosale) having its main office at Krishnamurthypuram, Mysore district Karnataka State represented by its Administrator SN Prakash s/o late Narayandas, aged 55 years r/o no. 1161, 8th main, Block- A Rajajinagar Second Stage Bengaluru 560010 ...PETITIONER AND 1. K. Jairaj, S/o K. Padmanabha Rao aged 63 years, occ: Administrator (appointed by the Government of Karnataka), having his office at Sri Vyasaraja Mutt (Sosale) no. 1, Benne Govindappal Road, Basavangudr, Bengaluru 560004 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 3. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, State of Andhra Pradesh at Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order/s more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in interfering with the activities of the petitioner mutt's [Sri Vyasaraja Mutt (Sosale) at Mysore] branch offices in the state of Andhra Pradesh, as being arbitrary and unconstitutional; and for a consequential direction to the first respondent not to interfering with the affairs of the petitioner Mutt's branch office at Kurnool in the state of Andhra Pradesh, pursuant to the order pearing" no. RD-67, Mudapra 2002, Bengaluru dated 26-52012 passed by t|je ^dv^mrnent of Karnataka, and to hand over the charge of management ^ tf jlje petitioner Mutt's at Tirumala, Nellore, Penugonda and Ananthapuranri • Jo the petitioner Mutt. x--'- l-A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 1634 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the first respondent to forthwith hand over the charge of management of the petitioner Mutt's at Tirumala, Nellore, Penugonda and Ananthapuram to the petitioner Mutt, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 1635 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the first respondent not to interfere with the affairs and management of the petitioner Mutt at its branch office situated at Kurnool town in Kurnool district, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. l-A. NO: 3 OF 2015fWVMP. NO: 3074 OF 2015) Between: K. Jairaj, S/o K. Padmanabha Rao aged 63 years, occ: Administrator (appointed by the Government of Karnataka), having his office at Sri Vyasaraja Mutt (Sosale) no. 1, Benne Govindappal Road, Basavangudi, Bengaluru 560004 ...PETITIONER/1®* RESPONDENT AND its main office at 1. Sri Vyasaraja Mutt (Sosale) having Krishnamurthypuram, Mysore district Karnataka State represented by its Administrator SN Prakash s/o late Narayandas, aged 55 years r/o no. 1161, 8th main, Block-A Rajajinagar Second Stage Bengaluru 560010 ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, State of Andhra Pradesh at Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dtd.29-01-2015, passed in WP.No.1251 of 2015 and dismiss the WPMP and the WP as being devoid of merits. Counsel for the Petitioner:— Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P. RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: ORDER r APHC010157462015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1251/2015 Between: ...PETITIONER Sri Vyasaraja Mutt (sosale), AND ...RESPONDENT(S) K Jairaj and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.. Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2.P RAJASEKHAR 3.0 The Court made the following Order: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief:- “to issue a writ or order/s more particularly one In the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in Interfering with the activities of the petitioner mutts Sri Vyasaraja Mutt Sosale at Mysore branch offices in the state of Andhra Pradesh as being arbitrary and unconstitutional and for a conseguential direction to the first respondent not to interfering with the affairs of the petitioner Mutts branch office at Kurnool in the state of Andhra Pradesh pursuant to the order bearing no.RD-67 Mudapra 2002 Bengaluru dated 26.5.2012 passed by the government of Karnataka and to hand over the charge of management of the petitioner Mutts at Tirumala Nellore Penugonda and Ananthapuram to the petitioner Mutt and be pleased to pass” None appears for the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader for Endowments appears for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 and Mr P.Raj Sekhar, learned Standing Counsel appears for Respondent No.1. On hearing, Mr P.Rajasekhar, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 submits that Respondent No.1 served as Administrator of Sri Vyasaraja Mutt (Sosale) from 26.05.2012 to 25.05.2018 for a period of 6 years and he has handed over the charges to the Peetadhipathi, Sri Vyasaraja Mutt, Sosale. Hence, the learned counsel requests this Court to dismiss this Writ Petition. 2. 3. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Endowments appearing for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 submits that the as the impugned order, dated 26.05.2012 passed by the Government of Karnataka, taking over the management and properties of Sri Sosale Vyasaraja Mutt is only for the period of two (2) years i.e., from 2012 to 2014, no cause survives in this Writ Petition for further adjudication and the same is liable to be closed. 5. Recording the submissions of learned Government Pleader for Endowments, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall 6. stand closed. SDI- G HELA NAIDU assistant f^GISTRAR SECTION^FFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri P. Rajasekhar, Advocate [OPUC] GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 2. Two CCs to 3. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:02/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.1251 of 2015 CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS