Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5558 (RAJ)

SMT. REENA W/O SH. YEETESH v. SMT. ANITA W/O DILIP SINGH

CW/2143/2024 · 2025-01-03

Avneesh Jhingan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:330] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2143/2024 1. Smt. Reena W/o Sh. Yeetesh, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village Abusar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 2. Yeetesh S/o Jagmal Singh, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Village Abusar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Smt. Anita W/o Dilip Singh, R/o Village Abusar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 2. Abhishek S/o Dilip Singh, R/o Village Abusar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 3. Rahul S/o Dilip Singh, R/o Village Abusar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 4. Manju W/o Satyapal Singh, R/o Village Abusar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 5. Himani D/o Satyapal Singh, R/o Village Abusar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 6. Himangi D/o Satyapal Singh, R/o Village Abusar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 7. Mohini D/o Lt. Ramdev Singh W/o Vinod Kumar, Age Major, R/o Palota, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 8. Government Of Rajasthan Land Officer, Through Tehsildar Jhunjhunu, Jhunjhunu District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 9. Rameshwarlal S/o Sh. Ramdevram (Deceased), Through Legal Representatives 10. Radhadin W/o Rameshwarlal, Resident Of Village Abusar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 11. Vijaysingh S/o Rameshwarlal, Resident Of Village Abusar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 12. Gayatri Devi D/o Rameshwarlal W/o Vijay Singh Katewa, R/o Gram Kanwarpura, Tehsil Chidawa, District Jhunjhunu 13. Jagmalsingh S/o Ramdev Singh, R/o Village Abusar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:330] (2 of 2) [CW-2143/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Batra,GC Mr. Ashish Sharma Upadhyay HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 03/01/2025 1. This petition is filed aggrieved of dismissal of application filed under Order 41 Rule 5 CPC and upholding of the dismissal by the Appellate and Revisional Authority. 2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that respondent Nos.7 to 10 are proforma respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the parties on specific instructions from their clients submit that the parties shall maintain status-quo qua the property-in-question, however, the Appellate Authority be directed to decide the appeal in a time bound manner. 4. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of directing the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal within six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In the meantime, the parties shall remain bound by the statement made in the Court for maintaining the status-quo. (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Simple Kumawat /97