Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55578 (CHH)

DR. SHAHID ALI v. KUSHABHAU THAKRE, PATRAKARITA AVAM JANSANCHAR VISHWAVIDYALAYA

WPS/3760/2023 · 2025-12-02

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:58725 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3760 of 2023 1 - Dr. Shahid Ali S/o Late Hidayat Ali Aged About 58 Years Occupation- Service, Associate Professor, Kushabhau Thakre, Patrakarita Avam Jansanchar Vishwavidyalaya, Kathadih, P.O. Sundar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh, 492013 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Kushabhau Thakre, Patrakarita Avam Jansanchar Vishwavidyalaya Through Its Registrar, Kushabhau Thakre, Patrakarita Avam Jansanchar Vishwavidyalaya, Kathadih, P.O. Sundar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh, 492013 2 - The Executive Council Of The Kushabhau Tahkre, Patrakarita Avam Jansanchar Vishwavidyalaya, Through Its Chairmen Cum Kulpati, Kushabhau Takre,patrakarita Avam Jansanchar Vishwavidyalaya, Kathadih, P.O. Sundar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh, 492013 3 - Baldev Bhai Sharma S/o Shri Mangi Lal, Aged About 68 Years Office Of The Vice-Chancellor, Kushabhau Thakre, Patrakarita Avam Jansanchar, University, Kathadih, Raipur Chhattisgarh, 4 - Shailendra Khandelwal S/o S.S. Khandelwal Kushabhau Thakre, Patrakarita Avam Jansanchar Vishwavidyalaya, Kathadih, P.O. Sundar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh, 492013 ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through-Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Diksha Pandey, Advocate For State For Respondent : : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Advocate Mr. Soumitra Keshrawani, Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 03.12.2025 1. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survives, and in view of subsequent developments, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena