APHC010574362024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 29973/2024 Between: 1. SUDIKONDA UPENDRA KUMAR, S/O ESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC PVT EMPLOYEE, R/O 1-134, B/C COLONY,YENDADA VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-530045. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, NEAR BUS STOP, SUJATHA NAGAR, PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 531173. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. PINNAKA HARI KRISHNA KISHORE, R/O D.NO3-246, LANE, ADARSHA NAGAR, OLD DAILRY FARM, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-530040. 5. PINNAKA SHOBA RANI, W/O HARI KRISHNA KISHORE, R/O D.NO3- 246, 7TH LANE, ADARSHA NAGAR, OLD DAILRY FARM, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA 2 PRADESH-530040. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA MOHAN RAO PATHAKOTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N SIVA REDDY 2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the 2nd respondent in disposing of his representation dated 05.08.2024. The petitioner is claiming title over the land admeasuring 505 square yards in Sy.No.7/4 of Yendada Village, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.4 and 5 submits that the petitioner is claiming title over the said property by virtue of the alleged entries in the Adangals. It is submitted that the respondent Nos.4 and 5 or their vendors have registered title documents over the property. 3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that the application submitted by the petitioner for conducting a survey is not in accordance with the requirements. It is submitted that the petitioner would have to submit a proper application by annexing a copy of the title documents and also paying the requisite fee for conducting the survey, and upon receipt of such application along with the required documents, the 2nd respondent shall depute the competent authority to conduct a survey by duly notifying all concerned. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off, granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh application in accordance with law by furnishing a copy of the title documents and complying with the other requirements with regard to the survey, and it is also made clear that in the event the survey 4 report identifies any encroachment, necessary action shall be taken. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 06.10.2025 PNS