Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5556 (KAR)

KIRANKUMAR S/O DAVAL DESAI v. SMT. KANCHANA W/O MAHABAL SADALAGI

WP/102992/2022 · 2025-02-12

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2772 WP No. 102992 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 102992 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: KIRANKUMAR S/O DAVAL DESAI AGE. ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O MAIGUR, TQ.JAMAKHANDI DIST. BAGALKOT …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GURULINGESWAR G GADAG, ADVOCATE) AND: 1) SMT. KANCHANA W/O MAHABAL SADALAGI. AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & HOUSEWIFE, R/O MAIGUR, TALUK: JAMKANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. 2) SMT. REKHA W/O BABU KININGE AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & HOUSEWIFE, R/O BUBANALTALUK: SHIROL, DIST: KOLHAPUR, MAHARASTRA 416001. 3) SMT. RAJASHREE W/O SHEKHAR KININGE AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & HOUSEWIFE, R/O BUBANAL TALUK: SHIROL, DIST: KOLHAPUR, MAHARASTRA 416001 GIRIJA A BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A BYAHATTI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.02.14 15:25:55 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2772 WP No. 102992 of 2022 4) SRI LAXMAN S/O ANNAPPA PADANAD. AGE: 82 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE. R/O MAIGUR, TALUK: JAMKANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587101 5) SMT. VASTALA W/O LAXMAN PADANAD. AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & HOUSEWIFE, R/O MAIGUR, TALUK: JAMKANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. 6) SRI. ANIL S/O LAXMAN PADANAD. AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & HOUSEWIFE, R/O MAIGUR, TALUK: JAMKANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 7) SRI. AJIT S/O LAXMAN PADANAD. AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & HOUSEWIFE, R/O MAIGUR, TALUK: JAMKANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. 8) SRI. ABAYKUMAR S/O DAVAL DESAI AGE: ABOUT 42 YRS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MAIGUR, TALUK: JAMKANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587101 9) SRI. UDAYKUMAR S/O DAVAL DESAI AGE: ABOUT 36 YRS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, NOW. R/O MAIGUR, TALUK: JAMKANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. 10) NEMINATH S/O RAMAPPA PADANAD AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2772 WP No. 102992 of 2022 R/O SONAKONATTI, TQ: ATANI, DIST BELGAUM. 591304. 11) MAHAVEER S/O BHUPAL PADANAD AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MIGUR, TQ: JAMKANDI, DIST:BELGAUM-587101 12) SUNIL S/O SETTEPPA PADANAD AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O SONAKONATTI, TQ: ATANI, DIST:BELGAUM-591304 13) RAJAKUMAR S/O SETTEPPA PADANAD AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O SANAKONATTI, TQ: ATANI, DIST:BELGAUM. 591304 14) RAOSAB S/O PARAPPA PADANAD AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O VIKRAMPUR COLONY, TQ: ATANI DIST DIST:BELGAUM. 15) SONATAI W/O JEERAPPA PADANAD AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: HOUEHOLD, R/O SANAKONATTI, TQ: ATANI, DIST BELGAUM. 551304 16) SUBHAS S/O KALLAPPA PADANAD AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O SANAKONATTI, TQ: ATANI, DIST:BELGAUM-551304. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.C. BHUTI., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; R4 TO R9 ADDRESS NOT IN VILLAGE; - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2772 WP No. 102992 of 2022 R10 TO R16 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF LEARNED ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE JAMKHANDI DATED 04/06/2022 IN O.S.NO.114/2015 ON I.A.NO.XVIII UNDER ORDER VI RULE 17 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC I.E. THE IMPUGNED ORDER ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE I.A.XVIII, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: i. Issue a writ of certiorari and set aside the order of learned Addl. Senior Civil Judge Jamkhandi dated 04.06.2022 in O.S.No.114/2015 on I.A.No.XVIII under Order VI Rule 17 r/w Section 151 of CPC i.e. the impugned order Annexure-A and consequently dismiss the I.A. XVIII, in the interest of justice and equity. ii. Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2772 WP No. 102992 of 2022 2. A memo dated 11.02.2025 has been filed and signed by the counsel for the Petitioner, which reads as under; Memo for withdrawal Herein, the advocate for the petitioner most respectfully begs to submits as under; That, the petitioner has challenged the order passed on I.A. No.XVIII under order VI Rule 17 of CPC dated 04.06.2022 in O.S.No.114/2015 on the file of learned Addl. Senior Civil Judge Jamkhandi. It is submitted that in view of the settlement the above said petitioner is not intending to prosecute the matter any further. Hence this Hon’ble Court may kindly be permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petitioner. Hence this memo. 3. Accepting the submission of counsel for the Petitioner that the dispute between the parties have been settled. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29