1 APHC010488912017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 938/2017 Between: 1. TATAPUDI BUSHANAM,, S/O. BENJIMEN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC: SARPANCH, R/O. TURPUKODIGUDLAPADU VILLAGE & GRAMPANCHAYAT, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT SUJATHA SHARMA, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (PANCHAYAT RAJ) PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 2. SRI N S S V PRASAD, DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. SRI BHASKER REDDY, DIVISIONAL PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, KANDUKURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. SRI SADASIVA RAO EXTENSION OFFICER, PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PAMURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. SRI S K CHAND BASHA, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, TURPU KODIGUDLAPADU GRAM PANCHAYAT, TURPU KODIGUDLAPADU VILLAGE, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y NAGI REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G SESHADRI(SC FOR MPP ZPP) 2 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri G. Mallikarjuna Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Y. Nagi Reddy, learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. Sri G. Mallikarjuna Reddy, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, submits that the Contempt Petitioner is no more. 3. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Case is dismissed as abated. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:13.11.2025 Vns