Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55543 (KAR)

B.P. RAMACHANDRA v. B.S. GEETHA

WP/14543/2025 · 2025-07-14

M Nagaprasanna

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25969 WP No. 14543 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 14543 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. B.P. RAMACHANDRA, S/O PUTTAHANUMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 2. MAHALINGEGOWDA, S/O BORALINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT BYADARAHALLI VILLAGE, BAGUR HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DIST - 573 201. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. YASHWANTH M. GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. B.S. GEETHA D/O B.L. SHIVANNA, W/O GIRISH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 2. B.L. SHIVANNA, S/O LATE LAKKAPPAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25969 WP No. 14543 of 2025 3. MANGALA, D/O B.L. SHIVANNA, W/O NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O BYADRAHALLI VILLAGE, BAGUR HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPTNA TALUK, HASSAN DIST - 573 201. …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNX-D THAT THE ORDER DTD. 31.07.2023 PASSED BY III ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT CHANNARAYAPATNA ON IA NO.I FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC IN O.S.NO. 632/2023 AND ORDER DATED 05.02.2025 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHANNARAYAPATNA IN M.A. NO.12/2024 AS PER ANNX-E AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioners though sought quashment of the orders passed by both the trial Court and the First Appellate Court, would seek to restrict their prayer for a direction for expeditious disposal of this suit. The suit is of the year 2023 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25969 WP No. 14543 of 2025 and for injunction against the petitioners instituted by the respondents. 2. In the light of the said prayer, and the suit being of the year 2023, the concerned Court shall endeavour to expeditiously dispose the suit. 3. With the aforesaid observations, without interfering with the impugned orders, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39 CT: BHK