- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26112 CRL.P No. 2860 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2860 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SRINIVAS C S/O LATE CHINNASWAMY V, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, PHONE NO. 9945929798 2. SMT YELLAMMA W/O LATE CHINNASWAMY V, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, PHONE NO. 9945926798 3. KUM LAKSHMI C D/O CHINNASWAMY V, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, PHONE NO. 8951480197 ALL ARE R/AT NO.434, 1ST CROSS, THIGALARAPALYA COLONY, PEENYA 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560058. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GIRISHA N, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26112 CRL.P No. 2860 of 2023 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY PEENYA POLICE STATION, PEENYA 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE-560001. 2. SMT LAKSHMI V D/O VENKATASWAMY, W/O SRINIVAS C AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, NO.47, 3RD FLOOR, 5TH MAIN ROAD, HVR LAYOUT, HOUSING BOARD, BANGALORE-560079, PHONE NO. 9880077399, 9606247246. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VENKAT SATYANARAYAN.A, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR REGISTERED IN CRIME NO.49/2022 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-A, AND CHARGE SHEET, AS PER ANNEXURE-B FILED PURSUANT THERE TO IN CC NO.3083/2023 BEFORE THE HONBLE 31ST ADDITIONAL C.M.M. COURT BANGALORE FOR OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 498(A),323,324,506 R/W 34 OF IPC, SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DP ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26112 CRL.P No. 2860 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners. 2. No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session. 3. This matter is of the year 2023. 4. Vide order dated 04.07.2025, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if office objections are not complied with, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. 5. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. 6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7