Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84612 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1372 of 2025 Applicant :- Bechan Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Jayanti Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Dheeraj Singh,G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed on behalf of the applicant to direct the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Court No.12, Jaunpur, to decide the Trail No.295 of 2024 (State of U.P. Versus Bhanu Pratap and others) arising out of Case Crime No.0097 of 2023, Under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station-Kheta Sarai, District-Jaunpur pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Court No.12, Jaunpur. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The applicant before this Court is the informant in the instant case and a prayer has been made for the expeditious of the said case. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in the said case charge sheet was submitted in the month of March, 2024 and the accused persons gradually appeared before the Court but since then only dates are being fixed by the learned trial court and no effective proceeding is going on. It is very surprising that if all the accused persons opposite party nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 are appearing but the trial court is not making any effort to fix a date for framing of charge and only dates are being fixed. 5. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. The learned Trial Court is directed to proceed and pass an order on the point of framing of the charge and if the charges are framed, all the possible efforts shall be made by the learned Magistrate for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 9. The court also takes note of the fact that the name of Sri Dheeraj Singh, is showing as counsel for opposite party no. 2, whereas he is counsel for the applicant. Office is directed to rectify this error in future. 10. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 20.5.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad