Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5554 (UTT)

SATISH KUMAR CHAUHAN v. ENGINEERS ENCLAVE NIVASIYA KALYAN SANGTHAN

WPMS/1173/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No.1173 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Rajendra Arya, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. The prayer made in this writ petition is to direct the Court below to expedite the proceedings of Original Suit No.521 of 2022, Engineers Enclave Nivasiya Kalyan Sangthan Vs. Satish Kumar and others, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge, (S.D.), Dehradun to decide the same within a fixed period of time. 3. Of-late, the Apex Court in the case of ‘Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi v. State of Maharashtra’ (Criminal Appeal No.4758 of 2024 decided on 25.11.2024 [2024 INSC 899]) has held that Constitutional courts may issue directions for the time-bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritizing the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts concerned where the cases are pending. 4. In view of the aforesaid legal authority, this Court finds that the present case does not fall within the category of ‘exceptional circumstances’. 5. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed. 6. Pending application if any, stands disposed-off. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 16.10.2025 SK