Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5554 (JHR)

BHAGIRATH PANDEY ALIAS KHEPA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1199/2025 · 2025-02-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 1199 of 2025 1. Bhagirath Pandey @ Khepa Pandey aged about 28 years, Pandey, son of late Dilip Pandey, 2. Rahul Pandey aged about 21 years, son of Badal Pandey, 3. Khadu Pandey aged about 54 years, son of Late Ram Pad Pandey, 4. Pappu Pandey @ Bindu Pandey aged about 33 years, son of Khadu Pandey, 5. Gurupad Pandey aged about 43 years, son of Late Ram Pad Pandey, All resident of Village- Pathar Katta Side, P.O.- Chas, P.S.- Chas (M) District- Bokaro. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : None For the State : None 02 / 20.02.25 No one turns up on behalf of either of the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No. 168 of 2024 registered under Sections 191 (2), 191 (3), 190, 118 (1), 118 (2), 109 (1), 352, 351 (3), 303 (2), 76, 62, 3 (5) of the BNS, 2023. Perusal of the record reveals that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, have attempted to murder of the nephew of the informant namely Aman Kumr Pandey and snatched away money and silver chain. It has been averred in the anticipatory bail application that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. It has further been averred in the anticipatory bail application that that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 8 of the anticipatory bail application. It has also been further averred in the anticipatory bail application that that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by the terms and conditions imposed by the Court. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Bokaro in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No. 168 of 2024 subject to the condition that the petitioners will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-