Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55539 (PAT)

Dinesh Das v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./46418/2025 · 2025-07-30

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46418 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2025 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== 1. Dinesh Das S/O Lakhan Das R/O Village- Saraiya, PS- Muffasil, District- Gaya. 2. Suresh Das S/O Shiva Das R/O Village- Saraiya, PS- Muffasil, District- Gaya. 3. Nilam Devi W/O Suresh Das R/O Village- Saraiya, PS- Muffasil, District- Gaya. 4. Raushan Das @ Raushan Kumar S/O Suresh Das R/O Village- Saraiya, PS- Muffasil, District- Gaya. 5. Rahul Das @ Rahul Kumar S/O Suresh Das R/O Village- Saraiya, PS- Muffasil, District- Gaya. 6. Rajesh Das @ Rajesh Ram S/O Shiva Das @ Late Shiv Shankar Das R/O Village- Saraiya, PS- Muffasil, District- Gaya. 7. Sanjeet Das @ Sanjeet Kumar Das @ Sanjeet Kumar S/O Rajesh Das @ Rajesh Ram R/O Village- Saraiya, PS- Muffasil, District- Gaya. 8. Ganesh Das S/O Lakhhan Das R/O Village- Saraiya, PS- Muffasil, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Priyadarshi Pankaj Raj Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 30-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 256 of 2025, instituted under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109, 117(2), 352, 351(2), 329(3), 329(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, 13 accused persons Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46418 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 2/2 including the petitioners assaulted the informant’s side causing injury to them. They also threatened to kill them. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties for the said occurrence. There is no specific allegation against the petitioners. Specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Ravi Kumar. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Petitioners undertake to co-operate in the investigation and trial. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 256 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.) U T