1 / 2 2025:CGHC:61821 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6382 of 2025 Jay Tulsi Multispecialty Hospital Through The Director- Amolak Kumar Jain Son Of Motilal Singhi, Jain, Aged About 43 Years, Mahamaya Chowk, Mahesh Nagar, Ward No. 43, V.I.P. Road, Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Director Of Health Services-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, State Nodal Agency, Fourth Floor, Health Bhuilding, North Block, Sector- 19, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, C.G. 3 - The Deputy Director Public Relation Department, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Collector Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Chief Medical And Health Officer Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2025.12.19 17:46:03 +0530 2 / 2 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For State : Mr. R.S. Marhas, Addl. Advocate General SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 19/12/2025 1. On objection being raised by learned counsel for the State that order Annexure P-1 is passed under Aayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Aarogya Yojna (hereinafter referred to as “Yojna”) and under the Yojna, there is remedy of appeal provided under Clause 6.3.4.12, after arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of objection raised by learned counsel for the State, he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail other remedy available under the Yojna raising all the grounds as raised in this petition. He however submits that as suspension is for a period of 6 months and about 1 month has already elapsed, therefore, appellate authority be directed to consider and take decision on appeal to be submitted by petitioner at the earliest. 2. In view of submission of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. 3. If appeal is submitted by the petitioner under the Yojna, then concerned authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously thereafter, keeping in mind the period of suspension. 4. Certified copy today. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen