- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26588 WP No. 20370 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20370 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. GOPALA G.N. S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT GULLAHALLI VILLAGE, SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIREESHA KODGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BEERASANDRA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 572 114. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26588 WP No. 20370 of 2025 HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. 5. SRI. RAJANNA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 6. SRI. ANAND KUMAR, S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 6 AND 7 ARE RESIDING AT DODDA KOLIGA VILLAGE, SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. 7. SRI. CHIKKANNA @ CHIKKA CHANNAPPA, S/O LATE CHANNAPPA, R/AT GULLAHALLI VILLAGE, SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) ------- THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 19-09-2024 IN RP 01/2022 AND 133/2022 PASSED BY 2ND RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND THE ORDER DATED 24-9-2021 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN RA(H)32/2019 AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents no.1 to 4.. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26588 WP No. 20370 of 2025 2. In this petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 19.09.2024 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent no.2 herein. 3. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGA and, on careful emphasis being made on the finding recorded by respondent no.2, makes it clear that, the petitioner is claiming right through his grand father- Munipapanna, in respect of the land bearing Sy.No.14 to an extent of 10 acres of land, which is alleged to have been granted as per the 'Grow More Food" Scheme. It is also forthcoming from the writ papers that, there is no permanent grant made in favour of the grand-father of the petitioner herein. 4. In that view of the matter, since a finding has been recorded to that effect in the impugned order at Annexure-A, by respondent no.2 herein, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE rs/CT: BHK