SUDHIR RAM v. THE CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, JHARKHAND URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED
WPC/1830/2025 · 2025-06-12
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5553 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5553 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:15178 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S). No. 1830 of 2025
---------- Sudhir Ram, aged about 46 years, son of Devyansh Ram, resident of Tetariya Tola, village-Chiyanki, P.O. Chiyanki, P.S. Sadar Medininagar, District Palamau .
…. Petitioner Versus
1. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, having its office at Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi.
2. The Deputy General Manager (HR), Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, having its office at P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi.
3. Electrical Executive Engineer, Electricity Supply Division, Daltonganj (Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited), having its office at Medininagar, P.O. & P.S. Medininagar, District Daltonganj.
4. Assistant Electricity Engineer, Electricity Supply Sub-Division, Kokar, Ranchi (Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited), having its office at Medininagar, P.O. & P.S. Medininagar, District Daltonganj.
5. Junior Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Section Chutia, Ranchi (Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited), having its office at Medininagar, P.O. & P.S. Medininagar, District Daltonganj.
………. Respondents. ----------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishabh Kaushal, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Mayank Deep, Advocate
---------- 09/ 12.06.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ application in order to approach the concerned respondent, if so advised.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection.
3. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant writ application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-