IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.657 of 2024 Date of Decision: 11.08.2025 ____________________________________________________________ Parmila …….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Others ….Respondents ____________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. ____________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, fairly states that on account of subsequent development, present petition has rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 11, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?