Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55529 (CHH)

AJAY GADEWAL @ NANHI DAU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/10019/2025 · 2025-12-16

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:61733 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 10019 of 2025 1 - Ajay Gadewal @ Nanhi Dau S/o Shivlal Gadewal Aged About 20 Years R/o Lafa, Barbhatha, Thana Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant (s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Sation - Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Shri Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Vivek Sharma, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 17/12/2025 The applicant has filed this bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrrik Suraksha Sanhita for grant of regular bail as he is in custody in connection with Crime No. 307/2025 registered at police station Pali, District Korba (CG) for the offence punishable under SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.12.22 12:17:25 +0530 2 Sections 137(2), 64(2)(m) of BNS and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 2. Prosecution case in brief is that mother of the prosecutrix lodged a missing report pertaining to her daughter on 16.08.2025 at the concerned police station. Pursuant to the said report, on search being made, the prosecutrix was recovered from the possession of the applicant and he was arrested. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He submits that in her statement under Section 183 BNSS, nothing has been stated by the prosecutrix against the applicant. He further submits that the applicant is in jail since 18.09.2025, the charge sheet has been filed and the trial is likely to take some time, he is ready and willing to comply with any of the conditions which may be imposed upon him and thus, it is submitted that the application be allowed and the applicant be released on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State opposed the bail application. 5. Victim and her mother were present in the Court and have raised objection for grant of bail to the applicant. 6. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 7. On due consideration of the rival submissions and the fact that the applicant is in jail since 18.09.2025, the charge sheet has been filed and looking to the fact that the final disposal of the trial is likely to take sufficiently long time, the present application deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, his bail application is allowed. 3 8. It is directed that in the event of applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions: i) He/she shall appear before the trial court regularly on each and every date, unless exempted from appearance. ii) He/she shall not make any attempt to tamper with the prosecution witnesses. Iii) the applicant is directed not to communicate/contact in any manner with the prosecutrix, her family members and the witnesses cited in the charge sheet any other person concerned or attempt to ask for any favour in the trial directly or indirectly. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge