$~67 & 68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1699/2022, CRL.M.A. 7249/2022 & CRL.M.A. 1212/2023 DR. SUNIL SAREEN .....Petitioner Through: Mrs. Rashi Bansal and Ms. Deepti Thapa, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC (CRL) with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Mr. Nitish Dhawan, Advocates for the State 68 + W.P.(CRL) 356/2024, CRL.M.A. 3333/2024 PRAMOD KUMAR CHOUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC (CRL) with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Mr. Nitish Dhawan, Advocates for the State Mrs. Rashi Bansal and Ms. Deepti Thapa, Advocates for R-2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 08.10.2025 1. Petition bearing CRL.M.C. No. 1699/2022 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to challenge the Summoning Order dated 17.11.2021 of learned ACMM in FIR No.0328/2017 titled as State v. Sunil Sareen & Ors. and also to quash the Chargesheet dated 25.01.2020 at P.S. Ranjit Nagar, Delhi. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2025 at 12:07:59 2. Cross Petition bearing W.P.(CRL) No. 356/2024 has been filed by the Complainant in the same FIR to challenge the Order dated 12.12.2023 of the learned ASJ whereby the Order of learned ACMM dismissing the Protest Petition seeking incorporation and further investigation in respect of offence under Section 304 Part II/419 IPC, has been dismissed. 3. Essentially, it is a case of medical negligence whereby the Summoning Order of learned ACMM has been challenged. 4. After some submissions, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Petitions to challenge the same before the learned Court of ASJ in accordance with the law with liberty to raise all these contentions before the learned ASJ. 5. Likewise, in the Protest Petition, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Petition with liberty to raise all these contentions in regard to the invocation of additional offences on the facts of the case before the learned Trial Court at the stage of charge. 6. In view of the submissions made, both the Petitions alongwith pending Applications, are hereby permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the respective parties to raise their challenges before the appropriate Forum in accordance with the law. 7. Insofar as the question of limitation is concerned, the respective Counsel are at liberty to justify the same before the learned Trial Court on account of the pendency of the Petitions in this Court and the learned Trial Court may consider the same in accordance with the law. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J OCTOBER 8, 2025/N This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2025 at 12:07:59