Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55519 (AP)

Singaraju Varaprasad, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/11990/2021 · 2025-10-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010208662021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11990/2021 Between: 1. SINGARAJU VARAPRASAD,, S/O SINGARAJU SRIRAMACHANDRARAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O ULLIPALEM VILLAGE, POTHEPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SINGARAJU RAJA SRINIVAS,, S/O SINGARAJU SRIRAMACHANDRARAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O ULLIPALEM VILLAGE, POTHEPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHILAKALAPUDI POLICE STATION, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more Particularly one in the nature of the writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering into the civil disputes and calling the petitioners to the Police Station frequently and harassing them to settle the civil dispute which is illegal, 2 improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 (1) (e) and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequentially direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere into the civil disputes and not to harassing the petitioners to settle the civil disputes, by calling them to Police Station frequently and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere into the civil disputes and not to harassing the petitioners to settle the civil disputes, by calling them to Police Station frequently, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to implead and bring on record the proposed respondents no.3 and 4 herein as the respondents 3 and 4 in WP. 11990/2021 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ order or direction more Particularly one in the nature of the writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering into the civil disputes and calling the petitioners to the Police Station frequently and harassing them to settle the civil dispute which is illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 (1) (e) and 21 of Constitution of India Consequentially direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere into the civil disputes and not to harassing the petitioners to settle the civil disputes by calling them to Police Station frequently and pass.” 2. Heard Sri G.Sai Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in the light of the interim orders passed by this Court the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of by making the interim order absolute. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.10.2025 SNI 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.11990 of 2021 Dated.06.10.2025 SNI 77