PASUPULETI USHA RANI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/22402/2023 · 2025-12-07
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55516 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55516 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010434242023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22402/2023 Between:
1. PASUPULETI USHA RANI, W/O. PASUPULETI MALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. HOUSE NO.5-47, NARASIMHA NAGAR, PATHAPATNAMVILLAGE , PATHAPATNAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GHANTALASALA POLICE STATION, GHANTASALA VILL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. GOPU SRI DIVYA, W/O. SUNKARA SYAM SUNDAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 31-7-17/A, GOGENENI VARI STREET, NISHA BAR ROAD, MARUTHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3 in
calling the Petitioner and her family to the police station frequently and harassing her to come to Ghantasala Police Station and interfering in the Civil Disputes in spite of pendency of O.S. No. 8 of 2022 and forcing to settle the matter in respect of land admeasuring Ac.1.14 cents or 0.462 hectares in R.S.No.69-2, Ac.1.12 cents or 0.454 hectares in R.S. No. 70-2, Ac.0.88 cents or 0.357 hectares in R.S. No.76-1B and Ac.1.24 cents or 0.503 hectares in R.S. No.216.2 situated in Pushadan Village and Grama Panchayat, Ghantasala Mandal, Krishna District as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 not to interfere illegally in the civil disputes of Petitioner and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent not to call the Petitioner to Police Station and not to interfere in civil disputes in respect of land admeasuring land admeasuring Ac.1.14 cents or 0.462 hectares in R.S.No.69-2, Ac.1.12 cents or 0.454 hectares in R.S. No. 70-2, Ac.0.88 cents or 0.357 hectares in R.S. No.76-1B and Ac.1.24 cents or 0.503 hectares in R.S. No.216.2 situated in Pushadan Village and Grama Panchayat, Ghantasala Mandal, Krishna District and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P S P SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22402/2023
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3 in calling the Petitioner and her family to the police station frequently and harassing her to come to Ghantasala Police Station and interfering in the Civil Disputes in spite of pendency of O.S. No. 8 of 2022 and forcing to settle the matter in respect of land admeasuring Ac.1.14 cents or 0.462 hectares in R.S.No.69-2, Ac.1.12 cents or 0.454 hectares in R.S. No. 70-2, Ac.0.88 cents or 0.357 hectares in R.S. No.76-1B and Ac.1.24 cents or 0.503 hectares in R.S. No.216.2 situated in Pushadan Village and Grama Panchayat, Ghantasala Mandal, Krishna District as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 not to interfere illegally in the civil disputes of Petitioner and pass such.…”
2. Heard Sri P.S.P Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that basing on the complaint of the G.Divya-4th respondent; the respondent police have called the both parties to the police station for preliminary enquiry. After enquiry, it is found the subject matter is civil in nature. He further submit that no crime has been registered against
the petitioner. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
5. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.12.2025. KKV
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
324
WRIT PETITION NO: 22402/2023
Dated 08.12.2025 KKV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: WRIT PETITION NO: 22402/2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
1
08.12.2025
Dr.VJP,J
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Vide separate order)
________ Dr.VJP, J KKV