Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55513 (AP)

D.Ramesh, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/3285/2022 · 2025-12-21

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010050982022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 3285/2022 Between: 1. D.RAMESH,, S/O. VENKATARAMANA NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, D.NO.19-9-3D/1, KENNADY NAGAR, TIRUPATHI TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR, A.P. 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, SRI BALAJI REGISTRATION DISTRICT, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. 4. JOINT SUBREGISTRAR 229, OFFICE OF THE SUB-REGISTRAR, RENIGUNTA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, RENIGUNTA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 3 and 4 in 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.3285 of 2022 refusing to register the document No.P1031/2020/35/2020 dt. 24-12-2020 submitted by me in respect of land in an extent of Ac. 0-71 cents in Survey No. 76/8 of Daminedu Village, situate in Sri Balaji Registration District, Renigunta Sub-District, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District and consequentially set aside the orders passed by 4th respondent in 35/2020 dt. 24-12-2020 which were confirmed by 3rd respondent in A.S. 13/2020 dt. 06-09-2021 and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to register the document and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to register the document 35/2020 document No. P. 1031/2020, dt. 24-12-2020 in respect of Ac.0-71 cents in Sy.No. 76/8 situated in Sri Balaji Registration District, Tirupati, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to permit the petitioner to receive the said documents and record the said documents part and parcel of in this writ petition Pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.3285 of 2022 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 in refusing to register the document No.P1031/2020/35/2020, dated 24.12.2020 submitted by the petitioner in respect of land in an extent of Ac.0.71 cents in Sy.No.76/8 of Daminedu village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District and consequently set aside the orders passed by 4th respondent in 35/2020 dated 24.12.2020 which were confirmed by 3rd respondent in A.S.No.13/2020, dated 06.09.2021 and consequently direct the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to register the document. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the 4th respondent filed counter affidavit but the same is under return in the registry with some office objections. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner made application to the 2nd respondent dated 12.08.2024 for deletion of the subject land from the prohibited list. In reply, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the same will be disposed of by the 2nd respondent following the due procedure. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner dated 12.08.2024, strictly in accordance with law, by hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioner, giving due opportunity, upon verification 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.3285 of 2022 of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of this order. Subject to out come of the same, the petitioner can approach the respondent Nos.3 and 4 for fresh consideration of the relief sought by the petitioner before them in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN Dt: 22.12.2025 sj 5 HBKM,J W.P.No.3285 of 2022 50 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 3285 of 2022 Dt: 22.12.2025 sj