110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3189-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.02.2026 GEETA ..Petitioner Versus POONAM BHATNAGAR ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Puneet Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwar Rajan, Advocate for respondent. SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. The contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 11.03.2025 passed in CWP-4291- 2025. 2. Learned counsel for respondent contends that in compliance of order dated 11.03.2025, order dated 13.02.2026 has been passed. Copy of the same is taken on record. 3. A perusal of order dated 13.02.2026 shows that order dated 11.03.2025 passed in CWP-4291-2025 has been complied with. 4. In view of the same, the contempt is purged and rule is discharged. 5. Needless to say that liberty is however granted to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 13.02.2026 in accordance with law. 6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. February 18th, 2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub/Saahil JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2026.02.19 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.