\ ,PHC01042269202S IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0^S ir\ ■'W o m WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE -jy PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21710 OF 2025 Between: P Ramachandra Reddy, S/o. P. Munikrishna, Aged about 42 years, R/o. D.N0.22-5-22/A, Kothapalli Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Department Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravati Guntur District 2. The Tirupathi Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner Tirupati, Tirupati District. 3. The Town Planning Officer, Municipal Corporation, Tirupati District. 4. The Deputy City Planning Officer, Municipal Corporation, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 5. The Town Planning Supervisor, Municipal Corporation. Tirupati, Tiruapti District. 6. M Venugopal Reddy, S/o. Venkat Reddy. Aged about 57 years, R/o. 22-6-20, Akkarampalle Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing / Transferable Developmental Rights (TDR) in favour of the Gth respondent for an extent of Ac.00.10 cents in Sy N0.II4/IA. situated at Thimminaidupalem Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, for the formation of plan 80 feet road during the pendency of Civil suit O.S No.893 of 2024 file of learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati is being arbitrary illegal, unconstitutional under Article 300A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to issue Transferable master on the , and Developmental Rights (TDR) in favour of the 6th respondent for an extent of Ac.00.10 cents in Sy No. 114/1 A, situated at Thimminaidupalem Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, for the formation of master plan 80 feet road during the pendency of Civil suit O.S No.893 of 2024 on the file of learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 to consider and decide notice dated 12.07.2025 submitted to not issue TDR bonds and not to entertain the claim of the 6“" respondent for TDR bonds Ac.00.10 cents in Sy No. 114/1 A, situated at Thimminaidupalem Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, pending disposal of the petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PATHURI SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5: SRI POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Counsel for the Respondent No. 1:GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN representation/legal for an extent of Village, main writ DEV The Court made the following order; APHC010422692025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] 0^ WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21710/2025 Between: 1.P RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/0. P. MUNIKXISHNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. D.N0.22-5-22/A, KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRIC 2.THE TIRUPATHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, COMMISSIONER TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3.THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4.THE DEPUTY CITY PLANNING OFFICER, CORPORATION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5.THE TOWN PLANNING SUPERVISOR, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. TIRUPATI, TIRUAPTI DISTRICT. 6.M VENUGOPAL REDDY, S/0. VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. 22-6-20, AKKARAMPALLE VILLAGE, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN REP BY ITS MUNICIPAL ...RESPONDENT(S); 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Transferable Developmental Rights (TDR) in favour of the 6th respondent for an extent of Ac.00.10 cents in Sy No.ll4/IA, situated at Thimminaidupalem Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, for the formation of master plan 80 efet road during the pendency of Civil suit O.S No.893 of 2024 on the file of learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati is being arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional under Article 300A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to issue Transferable Developmental Rights (TDR) in favour of the 6th respondent for an extent of Ae.00.10 cents in Sy No. 114/1 A, situated at Thimminaidupalem Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, for the formation of master plan 80 feet road during the pendency of Civil suit O.S No.893 of 2024 on the file of learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupatiand pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 representation/legal notice dated 12.07.2025 submitted to not issue TDR bonds and not to entertain the claim of the 6* respondent for TDR bonds for an extent of Ac.00.10 cents in Sy No. 114/1 A, situated at Thimminaidupalem Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: to 5 to consider and decide 1.PATHURI SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEVAP The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in issuing Transferable Developmental Rights (TDR) in favour the S"" respondent for an extent of Ac.0.10 cents of land in Survey No. 114/1 A, situated at Thimminaidupalem Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, for formation of a master plan 80 feet road. It is submitted that the petitioner and the 6'" respondent are contesting 2. O.S.No.893 of 2024 on the file of the learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge Tirupati, with respect to Ac.0.10 cents of land in Survey No. 114/1 A. Unmindful of the pendency of litigation and when the title to the property is seriously contested between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, the 2"'^ respondent could not have issued any TDR bonds in favour of the 6*'’ respondent. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2""' respondent, on written instructions submits that the land admeasuring Ac.0.10 cents in Survey No. 114/1A is not effected for road widening purposes as per the master plan and that the 80 feet road is cutting across Survey No. 106/4 and not in Survey 3. N0.114/1A. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. 4. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand glif^sed. Sd/- SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// / SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. Pathuri Srinivas Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. Potham Vengala Reddy SC For Municipal Corporation [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Admin and Urban Development, High Court of AP [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies GSC A HIGH COURT DATED:08/10/2025 ORDER WP NO. 21710 OF 2025 5( 0 5 NOV 2025 1% CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS