2025:CGHC:16566 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.A. No. 251 of 2017 1 - Smt. Mathura Bai W/o Late Jagatram Netam, Aged About 41 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Parvi, Police Station And Tahsil Bhanupratappur, District Kanker, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Manoj Kumar S/o Late Jagatram Netam, Aged About 26 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Parvi, Police Station And Tahsil Bhanupratappur, District Kanker, Chhattisgarh, 3 - Mahesh Kumar S/o Jagatram Netam, Aged About 24 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Parvi, Police Station And Tahsil Bhanupratappur, District Kanker, Chhattisgarh 4 - Mahendra Kumar S/o Late Jagatram Netam, Aged About 18 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Parvi, Police Station And Tahsil Bhanupratappur, District Kanker, Chhattisgarh ...............Defendants ---- Appellants Versus 1 - Smt. Sangita Bai W/o Late Jagatram Netam, Aged About 41 Years Caste Gond, R/o Thana Para, Durgukondal, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ku. Dipika @ Priyani D/o Late Jagatram Netam, Aged About 8 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sangita Bai, Caste Gond, R/o Thana Para, Durgukondal, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ku. Dipti D/o Late Jagatram Netam, Aged About 4 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sangita Bai, Caste Gond, R/o Thana Para, Durgukondal, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh .............Plaintiffs 4 - Project Officer, Woman And Child Welfare, Durgukondal, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh 5 - District Programme Officer, Woman And Child Development, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh, 6 - The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh ...............Defendants Respondents For Appellants : None. For Respondent/State : Shri Anand Gupta, Dy. G.A. For Respondent : None for the other respondents. ASHISH TIWARI Digitally signed by ASHISH TIWARI Date: 2026.06.16 18:24:21 +0530 -2- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 15/06/2026 1. Despite repeated calls, no representation has been made on behalf of the appellants. 2. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. All the pending applications are disposed of. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Ashish