APHC010604312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31186/2025 Between: 1. CHUNCHU HARIBABU, S/O. LATE KOTAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. DOOR NO. 2-89, ULICHI VILLAGE, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINICPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, AT ONGOLE. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DSP OFFICE, KOTHAPATNAM BUS STAND, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TALUKA POLICE STATION, ONGOLE, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. SMT CHUNCHU RAMADEVI, W/O CHUNCHU HARIBABU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS OCCUPATION. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O FLAT NO. 404, BR GARDENS, OPPOSITE ONGOLE PUBLIC SCHOOL, MANGAMURU ROAD, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRIC ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 3 and 4 in continuously harassing, threatening, and compelling the petitioner to settle his self-acquired properties in favour of the 5th respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, high-handed, violative of Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4, not to interfere in any manner with the personal and property disputes between the petitioner and the 5th respondent, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in any manner with the personal and property disputes between the petitioner and the 5th respondent, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....Pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 3 and 4 in continuously harassing threatening and compelling the petitioner to settle his self acquired properties in favour of the 5th respondent as illegal arbitrary highhanded violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in any manner with the personal and property disputes between the petitioner and the 5th respondent and pass” 2. Heard Sri Naga Praveen Vankayalapati, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that basing on the complaint of his wife, a case has been registered against the petitioner herein for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 79, 351(1) of B.N.S. and has been investigated into. He further submits that the police never insisted him to register the property in the name of his wife by interfering in the family affairs. 4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which is registered against the petitioner. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.11.2025 M K K 157 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No.31186 of 2025 Dated: 13.11.2025 M K K