APHC010722622022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 42612/2022 Between: 1. KANNEGANTI SREENIVASA CHARI, S/O.VEERACHARI AGE 52 YEARS, OCC WELDING SHOP ADIGOPPALA VILLAGE, DURGI MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT 2. KANCHANAPALLI RAMA CHANDRAIAH, S/O.SIVAIAH AGE 80 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION ADIGOPPALA VILLAGE, DURGI MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT 3. KANCHANAPALLI PEDASIVAIAH, S/O.RAMA CHANDRAIAH AGE 46 YEARS, OCC:CULTIVATION ADIGOPPALA VILLAGE, DURGI MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT 4. KANCHAPALLI CHINA SIVAIAH, S/O.RAMA CHANDRAIAH AGE 42 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION ADIGOPPALA VILLAGE, DURGI MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BYE IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALANADU DISTRICT AT NARASARAOPET 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , GURAZALA POLICE TOWN STATION GURAZALA, PALANADU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 3rd respondents in harassing the petitioners by calling to the police station in pursuance to the Crime No. 36/2022 registered under section 174 of Cr.P.0 without following any procedure established by law as illegal, arbitrary, high handed, contrary to law apart from being violative of article 21 of the constitution of India and 2 consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioners by calling to the police station in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with personal liberty of the petitioners without following the procedure established by law pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the Petitioners seeking the following relief : “... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 3rd respondents in harassing the petitioners by calling to the police station in pursuance to the Crime No.36/2022 registered under section 174 of Cr.P.0 without following any procedure established by law as illegal, arbitrary, high handed, contrary to law apart from being violative of Article 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioners by calling to the police station in the interest of justice and pass ...” At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the cause does not survive for adjudication and this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.42612 of 2022 05.11.2025 Mjl/*