Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55493 (KAR)

SRI. V S SUBRAMANYA v. SRI. S. CHANDRASHEKARAN

RFA/912/2023 · 2025-08-19

K S Hemalekha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32098 RFA No. 912 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 912 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI. V.S. SUBRAMANYA S/O LATE V. SUBBUKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDENT OF APARTMENT NO.41, BLOCK I, SHRIRAM SADHANA APARTMENTS, M.S. RAMAIAH ROAD, GOKULA, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU - 560 054. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. B. SHARATH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. CHANDRASHEKARAN FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PALINTIFF, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT B BLOCK, APARTMENT NO.38, BLOCK I, SHRIRAM SADHANA APARTMENTS, M.S. RAMAIAH ROAD, GOKULA, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU - 560 054. 2. SRI. S.S. GANESH FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PALINTIFF, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT C BLOCK, APARTMENT NO.12, Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32098 RFA No. 912 of 2023 SHRIRAM SADHANA APARTMENTS, M.S. RAMAIAH ROAD, GOKULA, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU - 560 054. 3. SRIRAM SADHANA APARTMENTS ASSOCIATION, OFF M.S. RAMAIAH ROAD, GOKULA, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU - 560 054. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI AVINASH KANT RAYKAWAR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. LAKSHMISH G, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS RFA IS FILED U/S.96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.02.2023 PASSED IN OS NO. 2988/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE LXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (CCH-64), BENGALURU CITY DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32098 RFA No. 912 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT The learned counsel for appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal and the said memo reads as under: "The undersigned submits that the matter is settled between the parties, hence the appellant does not intend to continue with this appeal. The same may be dismissed as withdrawn. Hence, the appellant requests to dismiss the above appeal, in the interest of justice and equity." 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA YN. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31 CT: BHK