Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1194 of 2025 1 - Mohd. Kamal Khan S/o Late Wazeer Mohammed Aged About 50 Years Caste - Musalman, R/o Ghuru (Maharana Pratap Nagar), Tahsil - Sakri, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Javed Zamil Mohammed S/o Late Wazeer Mohammed Aged About 34 Years Caste - Musalman, At Present R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Javed Mohammed S/o Late Wazeer Mohammed Aged About 32 Years Caste - Musalman, At Present R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Sabina Begum Wd/o Late Shakil Aged About 33 Years Daughter-In-Law Of Late Wazeer Mohammed, Caste - Musalman, At Present R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Ku. Aabida Bano D/o Late Shakil Aged About 11 Years Minor Represented Through Mother Sabina Begum, Caste - Musalman, At Present R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Kumari Shibu Bano Begum D/o Late Shakil Aged About 8 Years Minor Represented Through Mother Sabina Begum, Caste - Musalman, At Present R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - Parveen Begum D/o Wazeer Mohammed Aged About 52 Years Caste - Musalman, At Present R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 7 - Sahin Begum D/o Late Wazeer Mohammed Aged About 36 Years Caste - Musalman, At Present R/o Jarhabhatha, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 8 - The Collector District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shahid Ahmed Ansari, Advocate For State / respondent No. 8 : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, PL
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Order on Board 19/11/2025 Challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated 28.10.2025 passed by the 3rd Civil Judge Senior Division, Bilaspur, CG by which an application under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC filed by the parties herein was rejected on the ground that the civil suit was not registered.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if the civil suit was not registered, the learned trial Court could have kept the application pending and after registration of the civil suit, the same could have decided by the learned trial Court.
3. Be that as it may, perusal of the record indicates that the learned trial Court has observed that after the registration of the civil suit the parties are liberty to move a fresh application for compromise.
4. In view of above, as the liberty has already been reserved, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition therefore, this writ petition is disposed of.
5. All pending applications, if any, shall stands disposed of. Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput)
JUDGE Pawan