APHC010344162020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22843/2020 Between: BUDAVATI VENKATA NARAYANA, S/O. KOTAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. KONDEPI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE, 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANDUKUR CIRCLE, KANDUKUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KONDEPI POLICE STATION, KONDEPI VILLAGEAND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. BUDAVATI KOTI LINGAIAH, S/O. BALA KOTAIAH, AGED 75 YEARS, 6. BUDAVATI KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. KOTI LINGAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS, 7. BUDAVATI HYMAVATHI, W/O. KOTI LINGAIAH, AGED 65 YEARS, 8. BUDAVATI LAKSHMI, W/O. KOTESWARA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. ROSEDAR SRA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 4th respondent at the instance of respondents 5 to 8 in repeatedly insisting petitioner and his family members to appear before his authority and yield to the terms of respondents 5 to 8 by delivering petitioner's agricultural landed properties admeasuring Ac. 1.73 cents in RS No.244/6 of Kondepi Village and Mandal of Prakasam District, in favour of respondents 5 to 8, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioner's life, liberty and property.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties. 3. It is represented that the learned counsel for the Petitioner is no more. 4. This petition is filed seeking a direction to the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.8513 of 2021 Dt.14.10.2025 Dinesh